![]() ![]() However, the levels of war are also limiting because they draw divisions between interacting constructs. These models place junior leaders at the lower or tactical level, and rightly so. Some political and military leaders tend to think about war in terms of three hierarchical levels: the tactical, the operational, and the strategic, often displayed as a pyramid and customarily correspond to hierarchical levels in a military chain of command. Strategy remains a sum of the ways to apply means to achieve ends, and as General Perkins recognized, it involves so much more than decisive battlefield firepower. While the character of war is indeed increasing in complexity, the essence of strategy in warfare remains unchanged. ![]() He calls for a shift in strategy to “encompass more than delivering decisive battlefield firepower.” Perkins describes this shift as one from playing checkers to playing chess, characterizing the complexities and requirements of future warfare. Army Training and Doctrine Command is tackling the task of preparing the Army for future warfare. ![]() In a recent article, "Big Picture, Not Details, Key When Eyeing Future," General David Perkins describes how the U.S. “He who considers present affairs and ancient ones readily understands that all cities and all peoples have the same desires and the same traits and that they always have had them.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |